【Scooby Doo Porn Parody】

The Scooby Doo Porn Parodyauto industry believes self-driving cars are the future of transportation and could be a key factor in preventing accidents, but the public is wary of autonomous vehicles (AVs). So companies are looking to find new ways to convince consumers that driverless cars are a good idea.

Now, Intel says it can actually demonstrate exactly how safe AVs can be — and believes it has the math to prove it.

Amnon Shashua, who is the SVP of Intel's Autonomous Driving Group and CEO of recently acquired Mobileye, just published an academic paper that claims to provide a mathematical formula that can be applied to AVs to make sure that they won't cause accidents on the road. Intel and Mobileye also released a "layman's summary paper" on the formula, for those of us who never advanced beyond basic algebra.

SEE ALSO: The 'Google of China' is working on a driverless bus for next year and fully self-driving cars by 2021

Shashua and his co-authors' solution describes a "Responsibility Sensitive Safety" model, which Intel believes can be used to create autonomous vehicles that will never be responsible for a car accident. The model describes scenarios in which AVs will use pre-programmed systems to behave safely, like a "Safe Distance Formula" to handle highway driving.

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

Importantly, the model isn't designed to eliminate allaccidents — the framers acknowledge that there will be human drivers on the road with driverless cars for "decades," and people will still make mistakes and crash their cars. We've already seen human-AV accidents during Google's (now Waymo) and Uber's on-road trials.

The point of the formula, then, is to take away any question of liability from the autonomous systems during those incidents, which is a far cry from eliminating crashes entirely. Intel believes that AVs operating with a Responsibility Sensitive Safety model will be essentially blameless, which is probably not the first thing you want to tell someone after a fender bender.

Original image has been replaced. Credit: Mashable

Unfortunately, this appears to be the type of reasoning that makes the public nervous about AVs in the first place. People are skeptical about the decision-making process behind AI systems in general, but particularly when it comes to self-driving cars.

The new Responsibility Sensitive Safety model could make AVs the most accident averse vehicles on the road, but for many, the only way they'd feel comfortable letting a robot take the wheel would be if they're guaranteed to have an absolute zero chance of a crash. Until humans stop driving, that's impossible — so maybe Intel should stick to trying to win the public over to driverless cars with LeBron James instead of math.

---

Featured Video For You

---

Someone disguised themselves as a car seat as an experiment

---

Topics Artificial Intelligence Intel Self-Driving Cars

• Entertainment
• Life
• Games
• Digital Culture
• Shopping
• Social Good
• Science
• Tech

• The Best Gaming Concept Art of 2016
• Google and YouTube are investing to fight misinformation
• Looking at “Evidence,” One of the ’70’s Most Influential Photo Books
• Looking at “Evidence,” One of the ’70’s Most Influential Photo Books
• Pairing CPUs and GPUs: PC Upgrades and Bottlenecking
• Talking to Michael Robbins About Poetry, Capitalism, and Taylor Swift
• Underground in the 1940s: Alex Katz’s Subway Drawings
• Five Limericks (in the Style of Edward Lear)
• Best Samsung Frame deal: Free Music Frame with Frame Pro art TV purchase
• Staff Picks: Stephen Greenblatt, Eve Babitz, Halle Butler, and More

• Radical Flâneuserie: Reimagining the Aimlessly Wandering Woman
• The Last Days of Foamhenge
• How Champagne Became Synonymous with Luxury
• The Hopeful Dystopia of Pushwagner’s “Soft City”
• Jeffrey Eugenides on “Car
• Wordle today: The answer and hints for November 3
• That Time My Aunt Rose Faked Her Own Death
• Tinder launches Election Center ahead of midterm elections
• Wordle today: The answer and hints for November 2
• The Airless, Lacquered Perfection of Steely Dan’s “Gaucho”

• Acupuncture for pets is on the rise
• In the Mosh Pit, Who Gets to Have Fun, and at Whose Expense?
• Samsung soundbar deal: Save 43% off at Amazon
• Do Not Let the Robots Name the Colors. The Robots Are Color
• Amazon Prime Grubhub deal: Save $10 off orders of $20 or more
• 'Scavengers Reign' is the best sci
• Misplaced Logic: An Interview with Joanna Ruocco
• How to watch KSU vs. Baylor football without cable: kickoff time, streaming deals, and more
• NYT Connections hints and answers for May 1: Tips to solve 'Connections' #690.
• World Cup U.S. vs Iran match: The internet reacts

• Shop Owala's Memorial Day Sale for 30% off tumblers
• Best TV soundbar deal: Amazon Fire TV Soundbar on sale for $99.99
• Lolita Fashion: Japanese Street Fashion and Cute Culture
• The Key to Good Nature Photography? Trick the Animals.
• Wordle today: The answer and hints for April 14, 2025
• Is the TikTok trend dead?
• How to watch 'The Curse': Release date, streaming deals, and more
• Best Black Friday 2023 laptop deals at Walmart: Save up to $551
• NYT Connections Sports Edition hints and answers for May 18: Tips to solve Connections #237
• 'Dream Scenario' review: Nicolas Cage takes wild swings at cancel culture