It's a Silicon Valley tale as old as time. A company publicly screws up,define: eroticism promises to make things better, and then continues to repeat the same mistakes. But maybe, just maybe, Twitter is delivering some much needed edits to that particular fable.
As reported by the Washington Post, the San Francisco-based social media company has stepped up efforts to kick so-called fake accounts off the platform, and has found at least some success in its efforts. But that success might come at the cost of the company's bottom line.
SEE ALSO: Republicans think social media companies censor opposing political viewpointsFirst, the good news — at least as far as we're concerned. The paper notes that "the rate of account suspensions [...] has more than doubled since October" and has recently topped more than a million a day.
The type of accounts being removed from the platform include spammy bots and trolls, as well as accounts used for political disinformation campaigns, such as what we saw over the course of the 2016 US presidential race.
Interestingly, while kicking garbage accounts off Twitter is undeniably a positive for day-to-day users, the effect on the company's finances is less immediately clear.
The Washington Post notes that Twitter might see a decline in monthly active users as a result of the ongoing purge. MAUs are an important metric for measuring a social media platform's health, and a decline could impact advertising revenue.
When reached for comment by Mashable, a Twitter spokesperson was quick to suggest there's no need to get stressed about the Washington Post'sreported possible Twitter MAU decline.
"I want to emphasize that what's in the story is nothing new," insisted the spokesperson. "We disclosed it last quarter in earnings."
As far as the merit of the story is concerned, the spokesperson pointed us to a Twitter blog post in late June documenting the company's anti-spam efforts, and noted that, at least as of May of this year, Twitter had "identified and challenged more than 9.9 million potentially spammy or automated accounts per week."
Which is not too bad, I guess. Of course, "identified and challenged" is not the same thing as removed. What about those numbers?
"Due to technology and process improvements during the past year," the spokesperson said, "we are now removing 214% more accounts for violating our spam policies on a year-on-year basis."
Two hundred and fourteen percent! That sure sounds like a lot. However, even 214 percent of inadequate leaves something to be desired.
Even so, Twitter promises it's trying so very hard. Time will tell if those efforts amounted to much of anything, and what that means for the story of the company's stock.
Topics Social Media X/Twitter
New York tabloids had the same perfect headline pun for Eli Manning's memorabilia scandalFacebook cracks down on bogus 'likes' and zombie accounts in battle against fake newsSummer movie preview: What to watch if you just want to see the best of the best20 of the cutest cherry blossom things to get you ready for springHow an 'Uber for pregnant women' is saving lives in TanzaniaOnline dating is a total nightmare for farmersStarbucks could be jumping onto the unicorn train with a new drinkIt looks like 'Star Wars: Battlefront II' will ditch the Season PassThese 'Game of Thrones' photos are full of Easter eggs ... can you find them?How to keep your Easter egg decorating on trend this yearMicrosoft: We've already patched the Shadow Brokers Windows exploitsThe best TV and film Easter eggs of the yearIn the rapidly expanding Mastodon fediverse, there's an instance for everyoneRemote watch parties are the best thing to ever happen to introvertsMashTalk: Did Burger King cross the line with its Google Home stunt?The rise and fall of Rocket Leagues’ original championsNew York tabloids had the same perfect headline pun for Eli Manning's memorabilia scandalBill Nye and Tyler, The Creator just dropped the hottest theme song everHow to activate YouTube's hidden Dark ModeThese 'Game of Thrones' photos are full of Easter eggs ... can you find them? 'Quordle' today: See each 'Quordle' answer and hints for October 17, 2023 Shark vacuum deal: Save $150 at Amazon CNBC segment goes off the rails with barking dogs, man in underwear NYT's The Mini crossword answers for October 17 Falling for Fitzgerald Jason Shulman Takes Long Staff Picks: Brenda Shaughnessy, Bernadette Mayer, Rivka Galchen Glen Baxter Week, Day Three: Sex, Trees, Florists, Progress Becoming a Redwood JBL Live 660NC Headphones are $100 off Having Trouble Sleeping? Read This Extremely Boring Writing… People are accusing Instagram of shadowbanning content about Palestine Andrew Tate is affecting what kids believe about relationships Xiaomi HyperOS replaces MIUI as new operating system for smartphones Why are Americans freaking out about 'Naked Attraction'? TikTok is a growing source of news among UK adults My Autobibliography: Building a Library in Saint Lucia Staff Picks: James Turrell, Stuart Nadler, Alfred Stieglitz Mark Zuckerberg has promised to make your Facebook and Instagram feeds even worse It’s Disability Pride Month. So why is nobody talking about it?
3.5576s , 10195.765625 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【define: eroticism】,Steady Information Network