【1989 Archives】

Looks like China's beaten Kanye West to it.

An unofficial Yeezy store has opened in the Chinese city of Wenzhou --989 Archivesit's filled with knockoffs.

SEE ALSO: Kanye's sneakers appear in the most unexpected place: 'Splatoon 2'

The store's clearly not afraid about trademark violations, and is proudly displaying the word Yeezy in bold on its storefront, according to multiple social media posts from passers-by.

Original image has been replaced. Credit: Mashable

Not going to lie, the inside looks like a pretty nice sneaker shop:

Original image has been replaced. Credit: Mashable Original image has been replaced. Credit: Mashable

This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.

But to us, the best part of the store is its neighbour, New Bunren:

Original image has been replaced. Credit: Mashable

The fake Yeezys aren't cheap

But the shoes don't come at knock-off prices.

According to a report by China Network, the shoes sell for an average of $151 (999 yuan) -- which is quite a lot to shell out for a fake.

A genuine Yeezy pair will set you back around $200, though resellers in the market are exploiting limited stock, and charging exorbitant prices into the thousands.

And the fakes aren't even carbon copies.

Mashable Trend Report Decode what’s viral, what’s next, and what it all means. Sign up for Mashable’s weekly Trend Report newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

The most glaring difference is that they carry the words "Yeezy" on them, instead of the trademark "SPLY".

Original image has been replaced. Credit: Mashable

The store even offers personalised designs, allowing you to customise your "Yeezys" to any design of your liking.

Original image has been replaced. Credit: Mashable

According to China Network, the operation is not entirelyshady -- sort of.

The trademark to "Yeezy" was registered in 2013, by a Mr Hu, the owner of the store that the news outlet spoke to.

"Some time ago, the relevant authorities have ruled that the Yeezy trademark, which we registered with our company, is valid," he told the China Network.

A representative at LegalHoop, a trademark registration firm, also confirmed to Mashablethat the mark "Yeezy" had already been taken and registered in 2013 across several categories.

We're unable to confirm if the Wenzhou Haifan Trading Company is actually the firm who opened the Yeezy store, but it's a bit of a coincidence that the store also happens to be set up in -- where else -- Wenzhou.

Original image has been replaced. Credit: Mashable Original image has been replaced. Credit: Mashable Original image has been replaced. Credit: Mashable

Still, there's hope for Kanye yet. He may still be able to contest the trademark.

Last year, China's supreme court ruled in favour of U.S. basketball player Michael Jordan, after a Chinese sportswear company used his Chinese name for their products.

Qiaodan (Jordan's name in Chinese) Sports said it had registered the name more than a decade ago, but Jordan's lawyers successfully argued that they had used his name without his permission.

So who knows, perhaps it won't be long before Kanye comes knocking on their door.

---

Featured Video For You

---

These sneakers change design with the touch of your smartphone

---

• Games
• Entertainment
• Digital Culture
• Shopping
• Deals
• Tech
• Life
• Science

• Gods of War
• How Porn—and Lust—Have Changed Since the Seventies
• March 21 Is World Puppetry Day
• How Do You Make Art Last Forever?
• Big-League Bluster
• Novels Are Made of Words: Moby
• Victor Hugo’s Drawings
• Can a Novel’s Plot Be Reduced to Data Points?
• Dyson V8 Plus cordless vacuum: $120 off at Amazon
• John Jeremiah Sullivan Wins Windham Campbell Prize

• Best October Prime Day TV deals: Grab your cheap QLED now for the rest of football season
• When I Auditioned for George Martin: An Appreciation
• Corgi derby sees small dogs vying for the Queen's Platinum Jubilee crown
• 'Quordle' today: See each 'Quordle' answer and hints for October 12, 2023
• What Havoc Did “Under the Tuscan Sun” Wreak on the Culture?
• The best pets of 2022 (so far)
• Painting a Poem—Diane Szczepaniak’s Watercolors & Wallace Stevens
• Paris Match: The Answers to Dylan Hicks’s Puzzle
• “The Witch” and Its Distortions of Puritanism
• “The Unnecessary,” A Poem by Karen Murai (1990)

• SpaceX's Starlink will provide free satellite internet to families in Texas school district
• My Latest Phobia: Contact Lenses
• How a Tchotchke Became a Family Heirloom, of Sorts
• “Voyages to Disperse Enchantments”: Rimbaud in Ethiopia
• Bargaining For the Common Good
• Announcing This Year’s Plimpton Prize and Terry Southern Prize Winners
• Our Shrinking Vocabulary of Landscape
• What’s the Emotional Value of a Word?
• Best keyboard deals: Save on Asus gaming keyboards at Amazon
• The Thirteen Club: Dispelling Superstition Since 1882

• Astronomers saw one galaxy impale another. The damage was an eye
• Tim Kirkland, a Piano Tuner, Finds Religion in His Work
• Terry Pratchett’s Advice for “Keeping It Real”
• The Mystery and Beauty of Richard Dadd’s “Fairy Feller”
• Best iPad deal: Save $132 on Apple iPad (10th Gen)
• “Mating” Book Club, Part 1: Chasing Waterfalls
• In Alec Soth's New Photographs, a Fresh Take on Public Space
• Staff Picks: Silvina Ocampo, Gary Shteyngart, Brian Turner
• Best soundbar deal: Save $300 on the Sonos Arc
• Why “Junket Is Nice” Is One of the Weirdest Children’s Books