Meta cannot target a user’s sexual orientation in its personalized ads — even if they000 Archivesopenly queer and make public statements about the subject, the European Union’s highest court ruled Friday.
The case was brought from longtime Meta antagonist Max Schrems, as Wiredreports. The Austrian activist, whose separate privacy case recently led to a $1.3 billion fine against the company, claimed in this case that Meta broke EU privacy laws by pulling data on his sexual orientation via website visits, app logins, and other sources outside of Facebook, using all that data to target him with LGBTQ-specific ads.
Meta denies it engages in this practice. The company says it considers information on sexual orientation sensitive, and doesn’t indiscriminately include it in its advertising efforts.
When Schrems first took his claim to court, an Austrian judge ruled Meta has a right to target Schrems with ads related to his sexual orientation since he previously discussed being gay during a public panel discussion. But the judge also sent Schrems' case up to the EU legal system for its ruling.
Now the Court of Justice of the European Union has disagreed with the Austrian court, saying public statements aren’t a green light for tech companies like Meta to target sensitive ads to users.
The EU court also backed up Schrems’ assertion that Meta just doesn't pull data from users’ activity on their social media services, but also considers their behavior elsewhere on the internet.
Even if Meta can detect that a user is queer from their online or offline activities, the court said, they cannot take that information and use it to target them with personalized advertising.
In a statement, Meta said it takes privacy very seriously. The company added that it offers settings for users to control how information about them is used.
Schrems' lawyer, Katharina Raabe-Stuppnig, said the court’s ruling will increase limits and controls on Meta’s data-gathering.
"Meta has basically been building a huge data pool on users for 20 years now, and it is growing every day," Raabe-Stuppnig said in a statement, according to ABC News. "However, EU law requires 'data minimisation' ... following this ruling, only a small part of Meta’s data pool will be allowed to be used for advertising — even when users consent to ads."
Schrems' claims may seem like small potatoes. But there are enormous safety risks for LGBTQ+ people online if they are outed by targeted ads, especially in countries where homosexuality and bisexuality is illegal, and transgender people are already targeted for violence.
There may be money to be made by tech companies from deducing someone’s sexual orientation — since that individual may be more prone to buy certain goods and services — companies cannot put people’s lives and livelihoods at risk for that financial advantage, at least in the EU.
Topics LGBTQ Social Good
Student discovers snake that's slithered into her Gryffindor backpackSnapchat has a hidden Valentine's Day Easter eggGabby Petito's disappearance shouldn't be an internet true crime thrillerHow to let someone bypass your iPhone Do Not Disturb settingsThe iPhone SE with 256GB of storage has disappeared from Apple StoreApple vows to pay for Texas employee travel due to abortion banZac Efron, Corbin Bleu, and Christopher MintzThank you, Lupita Nyong'o, for making Michael B. Jordan do a bunch of pushA full list of 2021 Emmy winnersZac Efron, Corbin Bleu, and Christopher MintzA tiny Shetland pony had a munch on Prince Harry's handWhy women need Galentine’s Day more than ever this yearLG is selling a $1.7 million TVRoommates prank friend by turning their bedroom into a bad museum from the futureThis story of a heroic dog who died protecting his owner will break your heartThe whitest paint ever could save your energy bills and the climateChevy Bolt recall: Park 50 feet from other cars due to firesHow to add music to a SnapchatGet ready to preHot U.S. summer temperatures match record for extreme 1930s' Dust Bowl 'Mamma Mia 2' trailer has people upset about a main character death The stuff we hated most in 2017 Amazon just acquired smart home startup Blink Elon Musk teases what's next for Tesla in a year NYC bar really wants to teach people how to throw axes Queer cinema of 2017: Here's our picks Trump, women, and the new wave of feminism that could spell his defeat Windows 10 facial recognition if fooled by security researchers Miss America CEO resigns after sexist, offensive emails surface Adam Driver had no problem with shirtless Kylo Ren 'The Last Jedi' scene Qantas reveals the movies people watch the most on its planes Nestlé accused of diverting water from San Bernardino National Forest Tesla's huge battery gives coal station emergency power 620 miles away Netflix's 'El Camino Christmas' is a holiday film for no one The top 30 social good innovations from 2017 Disney removes Louis C.K.'s voice from reruns of 'Gravity Falls' 'Bright' review roundup: Critics hate Will Smith's latest 'Nintendo Power' returns in the form of an official podcast April the giraffe was our greatest love in 2017 iOS 11.2's Control Center clarifies the Wi
1.2366s , 8228.5078125 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【2000 Archives】,Steady Information Network