【Watch When the Camellia Blooms Online】

Researchers from the University of California,Watch When the Camellia Blooms Online Santa Barbara have developed a new, cheaper method for possible home COVID-19 testing that involves a smartphone camera and app.

The new testing system, which is the subject of a research paper printed in the journal JAMA Network Open, uses some basic lab equipment and the app Bacticount to detect possible pathogens in a person's saliva. To use it, you load your saliva sample into a test kit sitting on a hot plate. You then add in a specific reactive solution that amplifies viral RNA that might be in that spit, similar to the solution process that current at-home COVID tests use.

This specific process is called “Loop-mediated Isothermal Amplification,” or LAMP for short.

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

The sample would go inside the box on the left, where an LED would shine. Credit: University of California, Santa Barbara

Once any potential viral RNA is amplified, you place a cardboard box with an LED light over the top. Then, a smartphone's camera can look into the LED-lit box, where it should be able to see any color reactions that indicate the presence of COVID-19. If a viral load is present, the solution should create a bright red light. If the viral load is larger, aka more contagious, the red light should appear quicker. The app will estimate your viral load based on how quickly that light appears and registers.

According to Gizmodo, the cost of using this new test setup would be "less than $100, plus the price of the smartphone you’d need to run the app." For each subsequent test, which would presumably require a new test kit, you'd be out about $7 – a bargain compared to the hundreds that insurance companies have been charging for certain PCR and rapid tests.

SEE ALSO: Here's how to get free COVID tests delivered to your door right now

The researchers say this testing method could have the same accuracy rate as a PCR test, and being able to conduct the test at home could potentially allow for much quicker results than a PCR test taken at a doctor's office that handles hundreds of samples a day. However, it is important to note that this study did have a relatively small sample size of 50 people, so further research will be needed before it can be implemented widely.

The test kit was originally designed for "resource-limited settings," but its head researcher told Gizmodo that it could be easily adapted for home testing as well. The only caveat is that the Bacticount app is currently only compatible with the Samsung Galaxy S9 due to its specific camera calibrations. This could change in the future as research continues, and allow for more smartphone cameras to tap into the testing technology.

Topics COVID-19

• Science
• Life
• Games
• Tech
• Social Good
• Entertainment
• Deals
• Shopping

• Skype is finally shutting down
• A Loaded Deck: Bawdy Playing Cards from the Middle Ages
• Where Is Dracula Really From, Anyway?
• Why Does the First Person Come First?
• The best day to book your flight, according to Google
• A New Year’s Recommendation: The Score to “Thief of Bagdad”
• What Belongs to You: An Interview with Garth Greenwell
• Remembering Arnold Greenberg and the Complete Traveller
• What's Thermal Throttling and How to Prevent It
• A Pocket Atlas of Remote Islands

• The Exceptional Dovey Johnson Roundtree by Tayari Jones
• The Silence of Witches by Sabrina Orah Mark
• Now’s The Time: An Interview with David Amram by Gary Lippman
• 10 best DLCs 2023, ranked: No. 1 left me emotionally damaged, but it's worth it
• The Paris Review Staff’s Favorite Books of 2019 by The Paris Review
• Trash Talk: On Translating Garbage by Lina Mounzer
• Wordle today: The answer and hints for December 20
• Disgraced Congressman George Santos opens a Cameo account
• One Word: Bitch by Danez Smith
• Porn site names 'giantess' the 2024 fetish of the year

• The cicadas aren't invading the U.S.
• Steve Clay on the Beginning of Granary Books
• Writing Advice from S. J. Perelman
• John Clare, Christopher Smart, and the Poetry of the Asylum
• Fritz vs. Ruud 2025 livestream: Watch Madrid Open for free
• What Belongs to You: An Interview with Garth Greenwell
• Staff Picks: Peter Hujar, Luc Sante, Samantha Hunt
• How Sarah Meyohas Uses Art to Play the Market
• Gods of War
• The Fine Art of the Armchair Cookbook

• Whale Vomit Episode 5: Startup Monarchy
• On the Isles of the Shoals with Celia Thaxter
• A New Year’s Recommendation: The Score to “Thief of Bagdad”
• Things People Do: Four Paintings by Mernet Larsen
• Operation Rock Wallaby rains food down on wildlife hurt by bushfires
• Win a Free Copy of John O’Hara’s “Pal Joey”
• Last Chance: Get a Free Copy of “The Unprofessionals”
• “Homesickness”: a Draft of a Poem by Elizabeth Bishop
• Apple iPhone 17 Pro leaks highlight major new design change
• Too Clever: Oscar Wilde the Plagiarist